Country: Australia
Language: English
Source: Department of Health (Therapeutic Goods Administration)
Gadoversetamide
Mallinckrodt Australia Pty Ltd
Medicine Registered
P HARMACOKINETICS The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered gadoversetamide in normal subjects conforms to a two-compartment open-model with mean distribution and elimination half-lives (reported as mean ± SD) of about 13.3 ± 6.8 and 103.6 ± 19.5 minutes. D ISTRIBUTION Gadoversetamide does not undergo protein binding _in vitro_. The volume of distribution at steady state of gadoversetamide in normal subjects is 162 ± 25 mL/kg, roughly equivalent to that of extracellular water. [See U SE IN P REGNANCY ] M ETABOLISM Metabolism of gadoversetamide was not demonstrated in clinical studies. E LIMINATION Gadoversetamide injection (0.1 mmol/kg) is eliminated primarily in the urine with 95.5 ± 17.4% (mean ± SD) of the administered dose eliminated by 24 hours. The renal and plasma clearance rates of gadoversetamide are essentially identical (69 ± 15.4 and 72 ± 16.3 mL/hr/kg, respectively) in normal subjects indicating that the drug is essentially cleared through the kidneys via glomerular filtration. There was no systematic difference in any of the kinetic parameters as a function of dose level (0.1 to 0.7 mmol/kg). Therefore, within this dose range the kinetics of gadoversetamide appear to be linear. S PECIAL P OPULATIONS Impaired Renal Function: A single intravenous dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of OptiMARK TM Injection was administered to 28 subjects with impaired renal function (17 men and 11 women). Sixteen patients had concurrent CNS or liver pathology. Renal impairment was demonstrated to delay the elimination of gadoversetamide (see Table 2). The mean cumulative urinary excretion of gadoversetamide at 72 hours was approximately 93.5% for renal impaired patients and 95.8% for subjects with normal renal function. Impaired Hepatic Function: A single intravenous dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of OptiMARK TM Injection was administered to 5 subjects with impaired hepatic function (3 men and 2 women). Two patients had concurrent renal impairment. There was no differ Read the complete document